Skip to content
Longstanding

In 122,007 treadmill-tested patients, the fittest had one fifth the risk of death of the least fit

How strongly does cardiorespiratory fitness predict mortality?

The finding

Elite against low fitness: adjusted hazard ratio 0.20 (0.16–0.24). Below-average against above-average fitness carried a hazard ratio of 1.41 (1.34–1.49), the same as smoking (1.41).

Authors
Mandsager K, Harb S, Cremer P, Phelan D, Nissen SE, Jaber W
Published
JAMA Network Open 1(6):e183605 · 2018
Evidence
Read in the primary source; numbers checked.
Source
doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.3605

How it was studied

Retrospective cohort at the Cleveland Clinic: consecutive adults referred for treadmill testing, 1991–2014. Median follow-up 8.4 years, 13,637 deaths. Mean age 53.4. Fitness groups by age- and sex-specific percentile of peak estimated METs, from low (under the 25th) to elite (97.7th and above).

The numbers

For comparison in the same model: diabetes 1.40 (1.34–1.46), coronary artery disease 1.29 (1.24–1.35). Elite still beat high fitness (HR 0.77, 0.63–0.95), including in people aged 70 and over (HR 0.71, 0.52–0.98).

Elite thresholds in METs (1 MET = 3.5 mL/kg/min): men 40–49 at least 14.7, 50–59 14.0, 60–69 13.0, 70–79 11.5, 80+ 10.0; women 40–49 13.3, 50–59 13.0, 60–69 11.1, 70–79 10.0, 80+ 8.4.

What it does not show

Observational, in a referred clinical population. METs were estimated from treadmill speed and grade, not measured by gas exchange. "No upper limit" means no observed harm at the top; it does not prove that more fitness keeps adding benefit.

What Longstanding does with it

VO₂max is in the battery for this reason. We report it as a percentile against norms and never as a mortality multiplier for you.

Tests this bears on

Related